Nov 26 2009 01:38 pm
The link --->
http://www.Ufo-sandheden.dk
click in left side on :
Roswell Sensationer
.
and Eisenhower & Ufoer
.
The text can be translated into
english.
_________________
Nov 25 2009 03:21 pm
For readers.
If you haven't seen a clear ufo, close up, i daylight, please try this link:
Nov 24 2009 03:49 pm
Hello Scott.
I do like your web site. Nice work.
I have seen a ufo just 200 meters up
in the sky. A great sight!
I could not sleep after that.
For 3 days.
I saw the silvery ufo in daylight for
a period of ca. 15 seconds. -
Near by Denmarks biggest flod. Flood.
.
I will send your web site to many people and also to danish TV stations and news papers. - ( ! )
.
greetings from Denmark
Erling Roest
I do write on Facebook. - Aliens.
**********************************
____/ - - \____
Nov 15 2009 07:33 pm
Hi Scott
Sorry, I was being a bit generic with the military and police roadblocks. I remember the term used was military police.
The conversation took place within a day or two of the incident (can't recall the exact day) but a group of us were standing by the notice-boards at the bottom of the prefects' stairs in the main corridor.
The name of the boy was David (Dave) Waite. He would have been born in 1958 or 1959. His father would by now be around 80.
Cheers
Rob
Nov 15 2009 04:27 pm
Hi Rob,
Welcome.
The issue of a military presence on the night of January 23rd 1974 and on subsequent days in the general Corwen/Llandrillo areas is debatable.
I have a lot of anecdotal evidence of a military presence, in some cases, that presence restricting movements of locals.
Unfortunately (and this is something capitalised upon by Mr Roberts to confuse matters), there is very little concrete evidence to support this claim. On the face of it, one would think that a military presence would be recalled by many dozens, if not many hundreds of residents, but that is not the case.
I have spoken with dozens of locals who all recall the seismic event, but the vast, vast majority do not recall a significant military presence. Of those who claim there was, precious little evidence exists to back up the claims. There is however some evidence which backs up 'a small presence' of military personnel in the Llandrillo area, beyond the three man search and rescue team sent from RAF Valley at the request of the Gwynedd Constabulary.
What Andy Roberts has done, is invent a plane crash in 1972 (remember, he does not elaborate on the crash details!!) and he enhanced a genuine crash in February 1982.
There was a significant military presence in relation to this latter air accident and indeed, public and landowners were excluded from their land 'within' a cordoned off area around the plane crash.
He has attempted to claim that the locals did not see any military personnel on the evening of January 23rd 1974 when the UFO landed on Cader Berwyn - there was no crash - having confused the dates of other crashes and attaching these to events in '74.
I personally have no idea why any military would be blocking off forestry lanes etc near Corwen. The UFO was ten miles from there at the other end of the Range.
There have been claims that military personnel moved to the Berwyn area in advance of the UFO landing. It is impossible of course that a landing or crash could be predicted, so that information is pretty much on the back burner.
In the case of your school friend's father, like so many such witnesses, there is the claim and recollection of events, but seemingly little supportive evidence.
Would you happen to recall the identity of this person so the lead could be followed up?
Another problem, is that a military operation as described, would never see a joint military/Police operation insofar as manning a road block. The Police conducting PR yes. And there is ample evidence of Police conducting a search on Cader Bronwen. The Police thought a plane had crashed - their activities led the military to conduct a further search of that ground the following day, which covertly shifted to Cader Berwyn later on the 24th.
Had there really been a UFO on Cader Bronwen above Llandrillo and the military were involved, the Police would never have been allowed up there or, to had done so in the company of civilians.
While Andy Roberts has his personal reasons for discrediting matters, I am not adverse to the idea of a military presence, indeed, I have every reason to believe a small unit of soldiers approached the landed craft on the 23rd from about 21.40 hrs, I just dispute the scale of it all.
Despite claims by a handful of locals, not one has been able to produce supporting evidence of such road blocks for that January date. I very much look forward to anyone coming forward with such supporting evidence to prove the scale of the operation. Until they do, it will remain a loose end, which debunkers will try and manipulate for their own ends.
Cheers
Scott.
Nov 14 2009 01:06 am
I've just read Andy Roberts' explanation of the Berwyn incident published in Fortean Times September 2009 issue. I've never bought the Fortean Times before but noticed the front cover while I was wandering round Borders waiting for 2012 to start!
Anyway I'd just like to make one point. I was sitting reading on my bed in Ruthin School the evening "whatever it was" happened and can clearly remember the rumbling and shaking that took place. Some of the lads I shared a dorm with came from countries where earthquakes are common, so that became the generally held explanation.
However, over the next day or two one of the day-boys, whose father worked for the Forestry Commission in the Corwen area, said that his father had been prevented from travelling along some of the forestry roads leading up onto the Berwyns by road blocks manned by police and army personnel. So the "explanation" that all the locals were confusing military activity during the 1974 incident with military activity following plane crashes in 1972 and/or 1982 is rubbish.
Cheers
Rob Hughes
Nov 8 2009 02:37 pm
Hi Trace..
Thank you for the posting.
I have very strong views on exposure of what I believe is a global conspiracy of silence on alien visitation to Earth. While I am against the establishment of many countries depriving its peoples of the right to know, I have found over the years, that UFO enthusiasts themselves are equally to blame, by assisting these people to cover up the story.
The UFO subject is vastly wide and encompasses all sorts of theories. I acknowledge these, but believe if you concentrate on the spectrum, you spread your resources thinly. I prefer to concentrate on a particular facet and try to do it well.
As such, while I believe things like inter-dimensional entities may exist and that their vehicles from wherever may be refered to as UFOs if observed etc, being science oriented, I'm inclined to believe that the most likely scenario is one of the 'here and now'. By that, I mean aliens are simply another species, living organisms just like us. By definition that they can reach here from elsewhere in the cosmos, they are far more intellectually advanced than ourselves and their 'exotic' craft indicate this.
If however, you subscribe to the concept of captured technology and bio-material (spaceships and aliens), by the likes of Western and indeed Eastern military powers, then it must be accepted that these entities are biological and their machines though advanced to us, can break down or, be shot down.
There have been recent reports here in the UK of a continued state of readiness by a network of British war planes to intercept UFOs invading UK airspace. This seems to have come to light from reports that on several 'unconfirmed' occasions in recent years, British fighters have been ordered to fire upon such craft - pre-emptive attacks if you like.
As a science oriented person, I have one simple desire, and that is to expose the cover-up and prove to the masses that we are indeed being visited by alien entities.
Now I know what you are thinking about the concept of 'shooting' at aliens. If you consider that world militaries are happy to shoot at and recover extraterrestrial hardware and aliens, you must also accept that one faction of our world is doing this for its own ends, while making all of us out to be crazy - believing in things which don't exist.
I find that unacceptable.
For decades now, thousands of abductee claimants have surfaced. Survey the literature and you will find hardly a single reference to anyone trying to return with evidence of their encounters. Again, contactee claimants. A million and one reasons why no proof is provided by the aliens or via 'theft' by the claimant.
You must also consider that abduction is against ones will. It is a violation. We primitive humans put people in prison for such crimes, yet somehow seem to think kidnapping by aliens is OK. Bear in mind too, that only those returned by the abducters can speak of their experiences. Neither you nor I have any idea how many people might be adducted, never to return. Who speaks for them?
If surgical procedures take place, then that is vivisection. It is no different to how humans look upon lesser creatures and treat them.
If alien entities abduct humans etc temporarily or indeed permanently, keep them, then that is proof enough that compassion (a human emotion) is not an ET emotion.
I think they are so advanced that we are nothing more than lab' rats to these creatures.
Therefore, I cannot accept the above state of affairs.
I do not accept that militaries can have access to aliens etc at our expense. Nor, do I accept that aliens should have access to us.
The answer to that is simple.
Humanity has every right to defend itself from hostile alien intent. Humanity has the right to know.
To achieve this, the simplest way though fraught with difficulty, would be to acquire and place in the public domain, examples of advanced technology and/or examples of bio-material. Ideally alive, but if necessary, dead.
It is a simple scientific procedure to obtain a single example of an extraterrestrial biological entity for public consumption.
That will once and for all, settle the matter.
I do indeed refer to my glowing sphere. Had I been there as I say, armed, two weeks later, I would have tried to shoot the object.
I would add, that I never once considered it to be a vehicle containing a living creature. I somehow felt it was a remotely controlled device. Had I shot it, it would have disabled or destroyed the object or, it would have had no effect.
Assuming I survived such an encounter, I would now possess irrefutable proof of alien visitation and our world might be a better place, knowing aliens are real, instead of speculating and baiting those who know.
In this instance, the end justifies the mean. Otherwise, people a hundred years from now, will still be accusing the Authorities of a mass cover up.
The answer lies with us.
The Authorities get away with it, because we let them.
ET gets away with it, because we let them.
I can assure you too, that the UFO fraternity globally, is in such disarray because of infighting and disagreement, much of it based on ethics and morality, that it has probably missed many, many genuine opportunities. Indeed, the cover-up gangsters thrive on our infighting.
As I've written, there is no protection protocols in place to protect anyone discovering the proof needed.
Let me put it another way. If you had the good fortune to come across an alien entity who was 'friendly', do you really think you could announce this to the World?
I can assure you, that both you and your find will vanish. There is no price too high to pay to keep this quiet.
The immorality of capturing a specimen of an alien race to prove a point is nothing compared with the immorality involved in covering up this phenomenon.
I trust you will see my point, even if you don't agree with it.
Cheers
Scott.
Nov 6 2009 07:45 am
btw...my name is Trace... =0) Great Falls, Montana... I made the post concerning your gun and UFO's...forgot to post my name... sorry...
Nov 6 2009 07:44 am
Hi scott... I just HAD to write and let you know how much I enjoy your website. The information and the work you do is beyond words. Incredible work!!! I now have you bookmarked... =0) The only thing I find puzzling however is a comment you made concerning *A Real* UFO event that you did witness...you said: "Interestingly, had I been at that location a fortnight or so later, I would have been armed. I had my wits about me and had circumstances arisen, I would have launched two barrels at that object. The outcome of course is pure speculation."
I am an avid Ghost/Paranormal Hunter and when I'm confronted by a *Spirit* or *Ghost* I don't turn around and run full throttle away from said *Entity* Why would you then shoot at a UFO or harm it in anyway not knowing what they're doing in any particular spot ...etc..etc... If they're not harming you why would you then turn and harm them? Just curious... I know threw my studies that there are Grey's out there that 1 shouldn't mess with...is this what your thinking about when using a gun towards a UFO?
Well, again...I just wanted to say how much I've enjoyed your site. You have guts as well as a morale code I wish we used more of these days... keep up the good work!
Jun 22 2009 08:59 am
Hi everyone.
Just to let you know that I've set up the CUFOG email address now and it is conwyufogroup@btinternet.com
The old Hotmail address is now defunct.
Well it isn't really. It was closed down by Microsoft without explanation. Numerous attempts to contact the organisation has resulted in nothing but further abuse. All attempts at contact to find out why this has occured have been refused and ignored.
Scott L. Felton
Jun 22 2009 08:56 am
Hi Carson Dane,
Everyone is welcome to pass through or stay a little longer.
Scott L. Felton
Jun 21 2009 03:34 am
Just passing through,
Carson Dane
May 11 2009 06:56 pm
HI SCOTTLY, DID THE DAILY MAIL GET IN TOUCH WITH YOU,
PHIL XXXXXXX
Mar 30 2009 05:19 pm
Thanks for that John. Kind words indeed and much appreciated.
Cheers
Scott.
Mar 27 2009 11:08 am
Thanks Scott for the documents, and the opportunity to look at the web site, Im imprsessed with your 'stance ' and belief in UFOS and its ancillary phenomenon, the fact that one belives in UFOS does not mean that one cannot continue to enjoy life (surely the most precious commodity of all) what makes the difference is knowing that we are not alone on this Planet.It is not whether they exist but why? ironically there is a vast difference ( as you have found out)between the truths of a
genuine sighting and the unadalterated claptrap that some UFO documentaries portray, (never mind the tabloids) not so long ago Firefly was given the opportunity to put the record straight with publishing the real facts behind the Zygmunt Adamski case( he was the coal minor found ona tip in Todmorden)following an investigation by myself and Dave Sankey but they decided not to instead they decided to perpetuate the myth by associating it with the Alan Godfrey case.
Keep up the good work. John Hanson.Retired Police Officer writing up 5 Volumes of British UFOS
Mar 23 2009 06:20 pm
And continued tampering!
Jan 14 2009 12:44 pm
I see some frustrated sexual inadequate has been tampering with the CUFOG Wikipedia entry.
Jan 7 2009 08:45 pm
Hi Louise,
New Year delays, hangovers etc. Apologies. As you've emailed me, we can advance matters that way. Thank you.
Jan 2 2009 10:30 pm
Hi, sent you a sighting from New Years Day (early hours) I am keen to know if anyone else saw something around the same time
Louise
Dec 22 2008 04:55 pm
Yes Mate,
The link seems to be there now.
Cheers
Scott.
Dec 16 2008 10:38 am
hi scot try it now mate,the links should both be working now mate
tony
Dec 6 2008 12:24 pm
link below from mansey ,and be careful scott keep giving the police problems you will become the victim by being placed in there problem reaction solution programs they run
Dec 6 2008 12:15 pm
hi scott
important link on why your dvd was not the success it should of been ,
link
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=VTZ4Ces0HrM
Dec 1 2008 05:29 pm
Hi Scottly, have you changed your mobile number as i have sent you a couple of texts and had no reply.
Phil xxx
Nov 14 2008 11:25 am
Thanks for that mate. My appeal will be with them in a day or so. We'll see what excuses they spew out this time.
Nov 13 2008 02:33 pm
Hi Scot
I am pleased to hear that you are standing up to North Wales Police and will not give in to this Dictatorship of our senior police officers I stand with you we need the Truth as the old saying goes never trust a policeman WELL DONE KEEP IT UP I AM NOT AFRAID OF GIVING MY NAME OR ADDRESS.
Mike Mckenna, Colwyn Bay Member of Conwy UFO Group
Nov 2 2008 09:03 am
sorry that was me mate.........tony
Nov 2 2008 09:02 am
hi scot what are your views on hypercanes,i have been studying hurricanes and am now looking at hypercanes as i believe the intensity of the hurricanes which are now appearing are possibly leading up to hypercanes,this is what i get from the present crop circle formations,i don't think they will happen yet or in our life time as the sea surface temperature has to increase significantly than to what it is now but however the sea surface temperature is increasing and the hurricanes which appear everyyear are increasing in intensity,they are increasing in regards to ,well there are more catogory 4's and 5's appearing. all this i get from the crop circle formations,well when i get more information i will share it with you mate...
Oct 30 2008 11:38 pm
Test Post.